Skip to content

Home

  • in zh
  • 2 min read

KEDA - Kubernetes 事件驅動的自動調整

隨著雲原生應用程序的不斷演進，高效且具成本效益地調整基礎設施變得越來越重要。Kubernetes 在此領域發揮了關鍵作用，提供了強大的工具來管理容器化工作負載。其中一個工具是 KEDA（Kubernetes 事件驅動的自動調整），它根據應用需求提供精細的調整控制。在這篇文章中，我們將探索 KEDA 的概念和架構，並與其他 Kubernetes 調整工具（如 Karpenter 和 HPA）進行比較，討論 KEDA 和 HPA 如何協同工作，以提供可擴展且具成本效益的解決方案。

什麼是 KEDA？

KEDA，全稱 Kubernetes Event-driven Autoscaling，是一個開源項目，它擴展了 Kubernetes 的原生水平 Pod 自動調整器（HPA），以支持基於事件的調整。在 Kubernetes 中，傳統的調整通常依賴於 CPU 和內存使用等指標。然而，在許多情況下，這些指標無法準確反映基於外部事件（如消息隊列或 HTTP 請求）進行調整的需求。

KEDA 通過允許 Kubernetes 應用程序基於事件源（如 Azure 隊列存儲、Kafka、RabbitMQ、Prometheus 指標等）進行調整，解決了這一問題。通過與這些事件源集成，KEDA 可以根據需求調整工作負載的縮放，確保應用程序保持響應性，同時優化資源使用。

KEDA 的架構

KEDA 作為 Kubernetes 集群中的輕量級組件運行，增強了原生 HPA 功能。KEDA 的核心組件包括：

  1. KEDA Operator：KEDA Operator 負責管理 KEDA ScaledObjects 和 ScaledJobs 的生命周期。它監控事件源，根據配置的閾值觸發工作負載的調整，並與 Kubernetes 控制平面集成。

  2. Scalers：Scalers 負責將 KEDA 與各種事件源連接。每個 Scaler 實現從事件源獲取指標並將其轉換為 HPA 可用的格式的邏輯。KEDA 支持廣泛的 Scaler，包括針對特定用例的自定義 Scaler。

  3. ScaledObjects：ScaledObject 是一種自定義的 Kubernetes 資源，用於定義特定工作負載的調整行為。它指定事件源、調整閾值以及其他決定工作負載何時以及如何調整的參數。

  4. ScaledJobs：與 ScaledObjects 類似，ScaledJobs 定義了基於事件驅動指標的 Kubernetes Jobs 的調整行為。

KEDA 與 Karpenter 的比較

Karpenter 是另一個 Kubernetes 中的自動調整工具，但其運行方式與 KEDA 不同。KEDA 著眼於基於外部事件調整工作負載，而 Karpenter 是一種集群自動調整器，根據集群中資源需求來配置或釋放節點。

主要差異：

  • 範圍：KEDA 根據外部事件調整 Pod，而 Karpenter 調整底層基礎設施（節點）以滿足整體資源需求。
  • 用例：KEDA 適合需要根據特定觸發器調整的事件驅動應用程序。Karpenter 更適合需要基於集群資源需求優化節點配置的動態環境。
  • 粒度：KEDA 在 Pod 級別運行，調整副本數量；而 Karpenter 在節點級別運行，調整集群中的節點數量。

KEDA 與 HPA 的比較

KEDA 通過引入基於事件的調整，擴展了 Kubernetes 的水平 Pod 自動調整器（HPA）功能。HPA 是 Kubernetes 的原生功能，基於 CPU 和內存使用等資源指標調整 Pod 副本數量。

主要差異：

  • 指標：HPA 主要使用資源指標（CPU、內存）作為調整決策依據。而 KEDA 支持更廣泛的指標，包括基於事件驅動的指標。
  • 靈活性：KEDA 提供了更大的靈活性，允許您定義自定義指標和事件源，從而更精細地控制調整行為。

KEDA 與 HPA 的協同工作

KEDA 不會取代 HPA，而是增強其功能。在 Kubernetes 集群中部署 KEDA 時，它可以從事件源生成自定義指標並將其提供給 HPA。這使得 HPA 可以基於傳統資源指標和事件驅動指標做出調整決策。

例如，如果您有一個處理 Kafka 隊列消息的應用程序，KEDA 可以監控隊列的長度，並在消息數量超過某個閾值時觸發調整。HPA 隨後使用此指標以及 CPU 和內存使用情況來調整 Pod 副本數量。

可擴展性與成本效益

KEDA 通過提供對何時以及如何調整工作負載的精細控制，增強了可擴展性。通過響應特定事件，KEDA 確保您的應用程序在需求高峰期進行擴展，在空閒時期縮減，從而減少不必要的資源消耗。

這種基於事件驅動的方法本質上是具成本效益的，因為它最大限度地減少了資源過度配置。傳統的調整方法可能會基於高 CPU 或內存使用導致資源過度配置，即使實際的應用需求很低。而 KEDA 根據實際使用模式和外部觸發器進行調整，確保僅在需要時使用必要的資源。

此外，KEDA 與各種事件源的集成使您能夠針對不同類型的工作負載（無論是突發型、長期運行型還是需要特定資源閾值的工作負載）優化基礎設施。

結論

KEDA 是一種強大的工具，它通過引入基於事件的調整增強了 Kubernetes 的原生自動調整功能。其架構設計與 HPA 無縫協作，使您能夠根據廣泛的指標（包括外部事件）調整工作負載。與 Karpenter 等工具相比，KEDA 提供了一種更精細的 Pod 調整方法，是事件驅動應用程序的理想選擇。

通過利用 KEDA，您可以實現一個可擴展且具成本效益的 Kubernetes 環境，能夠動態響應應用程序的需求。無論您處理的是微服務、批處理還是實時數據管道，KEDA 提供了優化基礎設施所需的靈活性和效率。

  • in stock
  • 1 min read

SPY

  • 3 min read

Enforcing Kubernetes Policies with Gatekeeper

In the rapidly evolving world of cloud-native environments, maintaining security and compliance is paramount. Kubernetes, the leading container orchestration platform, provides the flexibility to manage workloads efficiently. However, with this flexibility comes the challenge of enforcing organizational policies to meet security and compliance requirements. This is where Gatekeeper steps in.

What is Gatekeeper?

Gatekeeper is an admission controller for Open Policy Agent (OPA), an open-source, general-purpose policy engine. Licensed under Apache-2.0, Gatekeeper serves as a validating (and soon mutating) webhook that enforces custom resource definitions (CRDs)-based policies within Kubernetes clusters. Hosted by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) as an incubation-level project, Gatekeeper decouples policy decisions from the inner workings of the API server, providing a robust mechanism for policy enforcement.

How Gatekeeper Works

In Kubernetes, admission controllers are plugins that govern and control the requests to the Kubernetes API server. They come into play whenever a resource is created, updated, or deleted. Gatekeeper leverages these admission controller webhooks to enforce policies defined by CRDs, ensuring that every change in the cluster complies with organizational policies.

Open Policy Agent (OPA) evaluates these policies. OPA is designed for Cloud Native environments and offers a flexible policy language, Rego, to write policies that can be enforced across the cluster.

Why Use Gatekeeper?

1. Automated Policy Enforcement

Manual enforcement of policies is not only error-prone but also fails to scale with the growth of the cluster. Gatekeeper automates the enforcement of policies, ensuring consistency across the cluster. This automation is crucial for maintaining a secure and compliant environment as the number of resources and changes increases.

2. Security and Compliance

Policies are essential to meet security and compliance requirements. With Gatekeeper, you can enforce policies that restrict certain actions or configurations, ensuring that the cluster adheres to organizational and regulatory standards. This helps in mitigating security risks and maintaining compliance with industry standards.

3. Operational Independence

By automating policy enforcement, developers can operate independently without compromising the security posture of the cluster. This independence accelerates development processes by reducing the feedback loop associated with manual policy checks and approvals.

4. Scalability

Gatekeeper's CRD-based approach allows policies to be defined, managed, and scaled efficiently. As your Kubernetes cluster grows, Gatekeeper scales with it, ensuring that policy enforcement remains robust and effective.

Implementing Gatekeeper in Your Kubernetes Cluster

To implement Gatekeeper, follow these steps:

  1. Install Open Policy Agent (OPA)

  2. Ensure that OPA is installed and configured in your Kubernetes cluster. OPA will serve as the policy engine evaluating the policies defined for Gatekeeper.

  3. Deploy Gatekeeper

  4. Deploy Gatekeeper using the provided Helm charts or YAML manifests. This sets up the validating webhook necessary for policy enforcement.

  5. Define Policies

  6. Write policies using the Rego language and define them as CRDs. These policies will govern the behavior of resources within the cluster.

  7. Test and Enforce Policies

  8. Test the policies in a staging environment before enforcing them in production. This ensures that the policies work as expected without disrupting the cluster's operations.

  9. Monitor and Update

  10. Continuously monitor the enforcement of policies and update them as needed. Gatekeeper provides observability features that help in tracking policy violations and compliance.

Conclusion

Gatekeeper is a powerful tool for enforcing organizational policies within Kubernetes clusters. By automating policy enforcement, Gatekeeper ensures consistency, enhances security, and maintains compliance. Its integration with Open Policy Agent provides a flexible and scalable solution for managing policies in cloud-native environments. Implementing Gatekeeper in your Kubernetes cluster not only strengthens your security posture but also empowers developers to work efficiently and independently.

For organizations looking to maintain robust security and compliance in their Kubernetes environments, Gatekeeper is an essential addition to their toolkit.

  • in zh
  • 1 min read

使用 Gatekeeper 強制執行 Kubernetes 政策

在快速演變的雲原生環境中，維護安全性和合規性至關重要。Kubernetes 作為領先的容器編排平台，提供了高效管理工作負載的靈活性。然而，這種靈活性也帶來了強制執行組織政策以滿足安全和合規要求的挑戰。這就是 Gatekeeper 發揮作用的地方。

什麼是 Gatekeeper？

Gatekeeper 是 Open Policy Agent (OPA) 的一個准入控制器，是一個開源的通用政策引擎。Gatekeeper 在 Apache-2.0 許可下運行，作為一個驗證（並且很快會支持變更）的 webhook，用於在 Kubernetes 集群中強制執行基於自定義資源定義（CRD）的政策。作為 CNCF 的孵化級項目，Gatekeeper 將政策決策與 API 服務器的內部運作分離，提供了一個強大的政策執行機制。

Gatekeeper 如何工作

在 Kubernetes 中，准入控制器是管理和控制對 Kubernetes API 服務器請求的插件。每當資源被創建、更新或刪除時，這些插件就會起作用。Gatekeeper 利用這些准入控制器 webhook 來強制執行由 CRD 定義的政策，確保集群中的每一次變更都符合組織政策。

Open Policy Agent (OPA) 評估這些政策。OPA 專為雲原生環境設計，提供了一種靈活的政策語言 Rego，用於編寫可以在整個集群中強制執行的政策。

為什麼使用 Gatekeeper？

1. 自動化政策執行

手動執行政策不僅容易出錯，還難以隨著集群的增長而擴展。Gatekeeper 自動化政策執行，確保集群中的一致性。隨著資源數量和變更次數的增加，這種自動化對於維護安全和合規環境至關重要。

2. 安全和合規

政策對於滿足安全和合規要求至關重要。通過 Gatekeeper，你可以強制執行限制某些操作或配置的政策，確保集群遵守組織和監管標準。這有助於減少安全風險，保持行業標準的合規性。

3. 操作獨立性

通過自動化政策執行，開發人員可以在不影響集群安全狀態的情況下獨立操作。這種獨立性通過減少與手動政策檢查和批准相關的反饋循環，加速了開發過程。

4. 可擴展性

Gatekeeper 的 CRD 基於方法允許政策被有效地定義、管理和擴展。隨著你的 Kubernetes 集群的增長，Gatekeeper 與其一起擴展，確保政策執行始終保持強大和有效。

在你的 Kubernetes 集群中實施 Gatekeeper

要在你的 Kubernetes 集群中實施 Gatekeeper，請按照以下步驟進行：

  1. 安裝 Open Policy Agent (OPA) 確保 OPA 已安裝並配置在你的 Kubernetes 集群中。OPA 將作為評估 Gatekeeper 定義的政策的政策引擎。

  2. 部署 Gatekeeper 使用提供的 Helm chart 或 YAML 清單部署 Gatekeeper。這將設置政策執行所需的驗證 webhook。

  3. 定義政策 使用 Rego 語言編寫政策，並將其定義為 CRD。這些政策將管理集群內資源的行為。

  4. 測試和執行政策 在將政策執行到生產環境之前，先在測試環境中測試這些政策。這確保了政策能夠如預期般工作，而不會中斷集群的運作。

  5. 監控和更新 持續監控政策執行情況，並根據需要進行更新。Gatekeeper 提供的可觀測性功能有助於追踪政策違規和合規情況。

結論

Gatekeeper 是在 Kubernetes 集群內強制執行組織政策的強大工具。通過自動化政策執行，Gatekeeper 確保了一致性、增強了安全性並維持了合規性。它與 Open Policy Agent 的集成提供了一個靈活且可擴展的解決方案，用於管理雲原生環境中的政策。在你的 Kubernetes 集群中實施 Gatekeeper，不僅強化了你的安全姿態，還使開發人員能夠高效且獨立地工作。

對於希望在 Kubernetes 環境中保持強大安全性和合規性的組織來說，Gatekeeper 是其工具組中的重要補充。

  • 3 min read

Migrating my blog from Gatsby to Astro

In the ever-evolving world of web development, selecting the right tools for your project is crucial. My journey began with Gatsby, a popular static site generator, but as my blog grew, I encountered several challenges that prompted me to explore alternatives. Enter Astro, a new static site generator that promises to simplify and accelerate the development process. In this post, I'll share my reasons for migrating from Gatsby to Astro and how this change has revitalized my blog's performance and maintenance.

The Challenges with Gatsby

Gatsby is renowned for its powerful features and vibrant plugin ecosystem. However, over time, I noticed some significant drawbacks:

  1. Slow Build Times: On my two-core CPU server, building the site, especially with images, could take almost an hour. This sluggishness was particularly frustrating when making frequent updates or publishing new content.
  2. Performance Issues: Some pages took an exceedingly long time to load. This wasn't just a minor inconvenience—it affected the user experience and potentially SEO rankings.
  3. Maintenance Overhead: The custom code we had integrated over the years made Gatsby updates labor-intensive. Keeping up with the latest Gatsby versions often required significant adjustments to our existing setup.

These issues created a significant technical debt, making the entire pipeline cumbersome and slowing down development.

Why Astro?

Astro is a relatively new player in the static site generator landscape, but it has quickly gained attention for its unique approach. Here are the key reasons why I chose Astro for my blog:

  1. Lightweight and Fast: Astro is designed to be lean and fast, focusing on delivering only the essential JavaScript to the browser. This architecture significantly reduces page load times, enhancing the overall user experience.
  2. Static HTML by Default: Unlike Gatsby, which often includes JavaScript by default, Astro generates static HTML for each page unless client-side interactivity is explicitly needed. This results in faster initial loads and better performance.
  3. Ease of Use: Setting up an Astro project is straightforward. The command npm create astro@latest quickly initializes a new site, providing a clean slate to start with. Astro's simplicity and well-documented API make it easy to learn and adapt to.
  4. Minimalist Approach: Astro encourages a minimalist approach, focusing on delivering content rather than overwhelming developers with extensive tooling. This philosophy aligns with my goal of reducing cognitive load and technical debt.

The Migration Process

Migrating from Gatsby to Astro was a surprisingly smooth process. Here are the key steps I took:

  1. Set Up a New Astro Project: Using the command npm create astro@latest, I quickly set up a new Astro site. The initial setup was minimal, allowing me to focus on transferring content rather than wrestling with configuration.
  2. Content Migration: I transferred the content from my Gatsby site to Astro. Astro's flexible content model made it easy to adapt my existing markdown files and assets.
  3. Styling and Theming: Astro's straightforward styling approach allowed me to recreate the look and feel of my Gatsby site without hassle. I took this opportunity to refresh the site's design and improve consistency.
  4. Testing and Optimization: After the migration, I thoroughly tested the site to ensure everything worked as expected. The performance improvements were immediately noticeable, with faster build times and quicker page loads.

Conclusion

Switching from Gatsby to Astro has been a game-changer for my blog. The reduced build times, improved performance, and simplified maintenance have revitalized my content workflow. Astro's lightweight nature and minimalist philosophy align perfectly with my goals of creating a lean, efficient, and manageable blog.

If you're facing similar challenges with Gatsby or another static site generator, I highly recommend exploring Astro. The migration process is relatively painless, and the benefits can be substantial, both in terms of performance and ease of use.

Migrating to Astro has been a breath of fresh air, and I'm excited to continue developing and enhancing my blog with this powerful tool.

  • in zh
  • 1 min read

將我的博客從 Gatsby 遷移到 Astro

在不斷變化的網頁開發世界中，選擇合適的工具對於你的項目至關重要。我的旅程始於 Gatsby，一個流行的靜態網站生成器，但隨著我的博客不斷成長，我遇到了一些挑戰，這促使我探索替代方案。Astro 是一個新的靜態網站生成器，它承諾簡化和加速開發過程。在這篇文章中，我將分享我從 Gatsby 遷移到 Astro 的原因，以及這一變化如何使我的博客的性能和維護得以改善。

Gatsby 的挑戰

Gatsby 以其強大的功能和豐富的插件生態系統而聞名。然而，隨著時間的推移，我注意到一些顯著的缺點：

  1. 構建時間過長： 在我的雙核 CPU 伺服器上，特別是當處理圖片時，構建網站可能需要將近一個小時。當需要頻繁更新或發布新內容時，這種遲緩尤為令人沮喪。
  2. 性能問題： 有些頁面載入時間過長。這不僅是個小麻煩，還影響了用戶體驗和潛在的 SEO 排名。
  3. 維護開銷： 我們多年來整合的自定義代碼使 Gatsby 的更新變得繁重。跟上最新的 Gatsby 版本通常需要對現有的設置進行重大調整。

這些問題產生了大量的技術負擔，使整個管道變得繁瑣，並且減慢了開發速度。

為什麼選擇 Astro？

Astro 是靜態網站生成器領域的一個新玩家，但由於其獨特的方法，它迅速引起了關注。以下是我為什麼選擇 Astro 作為我博客的主要原因：

  1. 輕量且快速： Astro 設計精簡，專注於僅向瀏覽器傳遞必要的 JavaScript。這種架構大大減少了頁面加載時間，提升了整體用戶體驗。
  2. 默認生成靜態 HTML： 與通常默認包含 JavaScript 的 Gatsby 不同，Astro 為每個頁面生成靜態 HTML，除非需要明確的客戶端交互。這導致了更快的初始加載和更好的性能。
  3. 使用簡單： 設置 Astro 項目非常簡單。命令 npm create astro@latest 可快速初始化一個新網站，提供一個乾淨的開始。Astro 簡單的 API 和詳細的文檔使其易於學習和適應。
  4. 極簡主義： Astro 提倡極簡主義，專注於傳遞內容，而不是用過多的工具讓開發者不知所措。這種理念與我減少認知負荷和技術債務的目標一致。

遷移過程

從 Gatsby 遷移到 Astro 是一個出乎意料的順利過程。以下是我採取的主要步驟：

  1. 設置新的 Astro 項目： 使用命令 npm create astro@latest 我快速設置了一個新的 Astro 站點。初始設置非常簡單，讓我可以專注於轉移內容，而不是與配置作鬥爭。
  2. 內容遷移： 我將 Gatsby 站點的內容轉移到了 Astro。Astro 靈活的內容模型使我可以輕鬆適應現有的 Markdown 文件和資源。
  3. 樣式和主題設置： Astro 簡單的樣式設定使我能夠輕鬆再現 Gatsby 站點的外觀和感覺。我也利用這個機會更新了站點的設計並改善了一致性。
  4. 測試和優化： 遷移後，我徹底測試了站點以確保一切正常運行。性能改善是立竿見影的，建設時間和頁面加載速度顯著提升。

結論

從 Gatsby 切換到 Astro 對我的博客來說是一個改變遊戲規則的決定。縮短的建設時間、改進的性能和簡化的維護使我的內容工作流程煥然一新。Astro 的輕量特性和極簡主義理念非常符合我創建精簡、高效和可管理博客的目標。

如果你在使用 Gatsby 或其他靜態網站生成器時面臨類似的挑戰，我強烈建議探索 Astro。遷移過程相對無痛，收益可以是巨大的，不僅在性能方面，而且在易用性方面。

遷移到 Astro 是一次耳目一新的體驗，我期待繼續使用這個強大的工具開發和改進我的博客。

  • 3 min read

An Overview of Reinforcement Learning

Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a fascinating and rapidly evolving area of machine learning, where an artificial agent learns to make decisions by interacting with an environment. Unlike supervised learning, which relies on labeled data, RL focuses on learning through experience, driven by a system of rewards and penalties.

Key Concepts in Reinforcement Learning

The core components of RL include the agent, environment, and actions. The agent is the learner or decision-maker, the environment is the external system the agent interacts with, and actions are the set of all possible moves the agent can make. The agent perceives its state in the environment, takes actions, and receives feedback in the form of rewards. The objective is to learn a policy, which is a strategy for choosing actions to maximize cumulative rewards over time.

A policy defines the agent's behavior and can be deterministic or stochastic, ranging from simple rules to complex neural networks. For instance, in a game, the policy could dictate the moves the agent makes based on the current state of the game. The reward signal, provided by the environment, guides the agent toward desirable behaviors. This feedback mechanism is crucial for learning, as it helps the agent distinguish between beneficial and detrimental actions. The value function estimates the expected cumulative reward that can be achieved from a particular state or state-action pair, aiding in evaluating and improving policies.

In RL, there is a trade-off between exploring new strategies (exploration) and using known strategies that yield high rewards (exploitation). Balancing these aspects is essential for effective learning.

Markov Decision Processes (MDPs)

Reinforcement learning problems are often framed as Markov Decision Processes, a mathematical model that provides a structured way to model decision-making situations where outcomes are partly random and partly under the control of the decision-maker. Markov chains, a foundational concept in MDPs, describe processes that transition from one state to another based solely on the current state. MDPs extend Markov chains by incorporating actions and rewards, making them suitable for modeling RL problems. The agent's goal is to find a policy that maximizes the expected sum of rewards over time.

Q-Learning and Deep Q-Learning

Q-Learning is a model-free RL algorithm that aims to learn the quality of actions, denoted as Q-values, which indicate the expected future rewards for taking an action in a given state. It uses an iterative update rule based on the Bellman equation to converge towards the optimal Q-values. Deep Q-Learning extends Q-Learning by using deep neural networks (DNNs) to approximate Q-values, a method popularized by DeepMind's success in training agents to play Atari games. This approach, known as Deep Q-Networks (DQNs), allows RL to scale to problems with large state and action spaces.

Key innovations in deep Q-Learning include experience replay, storing and reusing past experiences to stabilize training; fixed Q-Targets, using a separate target network to improve the stability of the training process; Double DQN, which mitigates the overestimation bias in Q-value estimates; and Dueling DQN, which separates state-value and advantage estimations to enhance learning.

Conclusion

Reinforcement learning represents a powerful approach for training agents to solve complex tasks by learning from interaction and feedback. By leveraging techniques like Q-Learning and Deep Q-Learning, researchers and practitioners can tackle a wide range of problems, from game playing to robotic control and beyond. As RL continues to advance, it holds the potential to drive significant innovations across various fields, enhancing our ability to design intelligent systems that learn and adapt in dynamic environments.

  • in zh
  • 1 min read

強化學習概述

強化學習（Reinforcement Learning，RL）是機器學習中一個引人入勝且迅速發展的領域，其中人工智能代理通過與環境互動來學習做出決策。與依賴標註數據的監督學習不同，強化學習側重於通過經驗學習，由獎勵和懲罰系統驅動。

強化學習中的關鍵概念

強化學習的核心組成部分包括代理（agent）、環境（environment）和行動（actions）。代理是學習者或決策者，環境是代理所互動的外部系統，行動是代理可以做出的所有可能的動作集合。代理感知其在環境中的狀態，採取行動並接收獎勵形式的反饋。目標是學習一個策略，即選擇行動以最大化累積獎勵的策略。

策略定義了代理的行為，可以是確定性的或隨機性的，從簡單的規則到複雜的神經網絡。例如，在遊戲中，策略可以根據遊戲的當前狀態決定代理的動作。由環境提供的獎勵信號引導代理向有利的行為前進。這種反饋機制對學習至關重要，因為它幫助代理區分有益和有害的行為。價值函數估計可以從特定狀態或狀態-行動對中獲得的期望累積獎勵，有助於評估和改進策略。

在強化學習中，需要在探索新策略（探索）和利用已知高獎勵策略（利用）之間取得平衡。平衡這些方面對於有效學習至關重要。

馬爾可夫決策過程（MDPs）

強化學習問題通常被框架化為馬爾可夫決策過程（Markov Decision Processes，MDPs），這是一種數學模型，為建模決策情境提供了結構化的方法，其中結果部分是隨機的，部分由決策者控制。馬爾可夫鏈（Markov chains）是MDPs的基礎概念，它描述了僅根據當前狀態從一個狀態轉換到另一個狀態的過程。MDPs通過引入行動和獎勵來擴展馬爾可夫鏈，使其適合於建模強化學習問題。代理的目標是找到最大化期望累積獎勵的策略。

Q學習和深度Q學習

Q學習（Q-Learning）是一種無模型的強化學習算法，其目的是學習行動的質量（即Q值），這些Q值指示在給定狀態下採取某行動的期望未來獎勵。它使用基於Bellman方程的迭代更新規則來趨向最佳Q值。深度Q學習（Deep Q-Learning）通過使用深度神經網絡（DNNs）來近似Q值擴展了Q學習，這種方法因DeepMind訓練代理玩Atari遊戲的成功而受到廣泛關注。這種方法，被稱為深度Q網絡（DQNs），允許強化學習擴展到具有大型狀態和行動空間的問題。

深度Q學習中的關鍵創新包括經驗回放（experience replay），存儲和重用過去的經驗以穩定訓練；固定Q目標（fixed Q-Targets），使用一個單獨的目標網絡來改進訓練過程的穩定性；雙重DQN（Double DQN），它減少了Q值估計中的過高估計偏差；和對抗DQN（Dueling DQN），它分離狀態值和優勢估計以加強學習。

結論

強化學習代表了一種強大的方法，用於通過學習從互動和反饋中訓練代理來解決複雜任務。通過利用Q學習和深度Q學習等技術，研究人員和實踐者可以解決從遊戲到機器人控制等廣泛的問題。隨著強化學習的不斷進步，它有望在各個領域驅動重大創新，增強我們設計智能系統的能力，這些系統能夠在動態環境中學習和適應。

  • 2 min read

Reflection on Leadership Tension - The Expert vs. The Learner

As a Solution Architect at Thought Machine, I often face a leadership challenge: balancing my established expertise with the need to keep learning. This is especially important given the constantly changing landscape of our cloud-native core banking product.

After four years working with this product, I've gained deep knowledge, allowing me to answer most client questions confidently. However, relying solely on past knowledge isn't enough. Our product and digital trends are evolving quickly, with new technologies and regulatory changes regularly emerging. To stay relevant, I need to continue learning through industry conferences, webinars, and training sessions, ensuring I understand both new features and how they can address client needs. Engaging with clients and listening to their feedback is also crucial in tailoring solutions that are both innovative and practical.

I'm particularly interested in building high-performance teams that align with business transformation goals. Leading projects that transition from legacy systems to cloud solutions highlights the need for alignment between business and technology teams. These groups often have different priorities and can miscommunicate, leading to misalignment, especially as deadlines approach. Better alignment can improve performance and ensure projects are completed on time and within budget, boosting morale and delivering high value, particularly in challenging times such as during retrenchment.

A key question is how to keep team motivation high during rapid changes and uncertainty, especially with financial constraints and tech layoffs. It's important to ensure that team members understand and are committed to the project’s vision and their role in its success. Demonstrating empathy, providing support, and fostering open communication and collaboration between teams can help maintain alignment and mutual understanding. Additionally, showing humility by being open to feedback and willing to adapt based on team insights helps create a culture of continuous improvement and respect.

Reflecting on Alan Mulally’s leadership at Ford, we can learn from his combination of enduring and emerging leadership behaviors. He set a clear vision, focused on performance, led by example, and took calculated risks. He was also purpose-driven, empathetic, inclusive, and humble. Mulally balanced the roles of being a tactician and a visionary and managed the tension between holding power and sharing it. These lessons are valuable in understanding how to navigate the balance between being an expert and a learner. By applying these strategies, I aim to enhance my leadership effectiveness, ensuring my team is well-prepared to meet the challenges of an evolving technological landscape and deliver exceptional value to our clients.

  • in zh
  • 1 min read

關於領導力緊張的反思 - 專家與學習者

作為 Thought Machine 的解決方案架構師，我經常面臨領導力挑戰：平衡已經建立的專業知識和不斷學習的需求。這在我們的雲原生核心銀行產品不斷變化的環境中尤為重要。

在與這個產品合作四年後，我獲得了深厚的知識，能夠自信地回答大多數客戶的問題。然而，僅依靠過去的知識是不夠的。我們的產品和數字趨勢快速發展，新技術和監管變化經常出現。為了保持相關性，我需要通過行業會議、網絡研討會和培訓課程繼續學習，確保我了解新功能及其如何滿足客戶需求。與客戶互動並聆聽他們的反饋也很重要，以便制定既創新又實際的解決方案。

我特別感興趣的是建立與業務轉型目標一致的高效能團隊。領導從傳統系統向雲端解決方案過渡的項目，強調了業務與技術團隊之間的協同必要性。這些團隊經常有不同的優先事項，並可能溝通不暢，尤其是在項目接近截止日期時。更好的協同可以提高績效，確保項目按時並在預算內完成，提高士氣，並在困難時期，如裁員時提供高價值。

一個關鍵問題是如何在快速變化和不確定性中保持團隊的高動力，尤其是在財務壓力和技術裁員的情況下。確保團隊成員了解並致力於項目的願景及其成功中的角色至關重要。展示同理心，提供支持，促進團隊之間的開放溝通和協作，有助於保持協同和相互理解。此外，通過開放接受反饋並根據團隊見解願意適應，展示謙遜，可以營造一種持續改進和尊重的文化。

回顧 Alan Mulally 在福特的領導，我們可以從他結合持久和新興領導行為中學到很多。他設定了明確的願景，專注於績效，以身作則並進行計算風險。他也有目標導向、同理心、包容性和謙遜。Mulally 平衡了戰術家和願景家的角色，並管理了持權與分權之間的緊張關係。這些經驗教訓對於理解如何在專家與學習者之間取得平衡非常寶貴。通過應用這些策略，我旨在提高我的領導效能，確保我的團隊為迎接不斷變化的技術環境中的挑戰做好準備，並為我們的客戶提供卓越的價值。