Loading verified market, valuation, and statement data.
2. Company Fundamentals
2.1 Competitiveness
| Metric |
Value |
| Operating Margins |
20.03% |
| Profit Margins |
-1.53% |
| Return on Equity |
-2.39% |
| Return on Assets |
5.21% |
| Free Float |
0.1B |
| Dividend Yield |
3.80% |
| Short Int % Utilisation |
5.54% |
2.2 Growth
| Metric |
Value |
| Revenue Growth |
5.8% |
| Free Cash Flow |
1.06B |
| EBITDA |
9.86 (Ratio) |
| Enterprise Value |
19.39B |
| EV/Revenue |
2.14 |
| EV/EBITDA |
9.86 |
Revenue growth of 5.8% indicates steady, moderate expansion.
2.3 Management
| Role |
Metric |
| Consensus Rating |
N/A |
2.4 Return
| Metric |
Value |
| Expected Return (Ann.)* |
18.15% |
| Risk / Std Dev (Ann.)* |
29.09% |
| 1-Year Price Return* |
13.05% |
Latest Market Data (as of 2026-08-14, US Eastern time):
| Metric |
Value |
| Last Price |
$121.39 |
| 52-Week Range |
$88.25 – $127.65 |
| Observation Count |
248 trading days |
The return and risk statistics use daily adjusted closes from the retrieved one-year series and annualise daily moments using 252 trading days. The last price is the latest regular-market price reported for the stated date. Source: Yahoo Finance market data.
DuPont Model Analysis
The DuPont model decomposes return on equity (ROE) into three operating and capital-structure drivers:
ROE = Net Margin × Asset Turnover × Equity Multiplier
The comparison uses the latest two comparable annual periods available for the issuer, with reported statement amounts shown in US$. Revenue and net income are income-statement flows; total assets and shareholders’ equity are year-end balance-sheet figures. This is a simplified year-end-balance DuPont comparison rather than an average-balance ROE calculation.
| DuPont component |
Calculation |
FY2026 |
FY2025 |
| Revenue |
Reported revenue |
$9.05B |
$8.73B |
| Net income |
Reported net income |
$-138.70M |
$-1.23B |
| Total assets |
Year-end reported balance |
$16.22B |
$17.56B |
| Shareholders’ equity |
Year-end reported balance |
$5.54B |
$6.08B |
| Net margin |
Net income ÷ revenue |
-1.53% |
-14.10% |
| Asset turnover |
Revenue ÷ total assets |
0.5580x |
0.4968x |
| Equity multiplier |
Total assets ÷ shareholders’ equity |
2.9257x |
2.8875x |
| ROE |
Net margin × asset turnover × equity multiplier |
-2.50% |
-20.23% |
Source: Yahoo Finance annual statements. Values are based on the two latest comparable annual periods returned by the source; fiscal period labels use the statement period-end year.
2.5 FCFF DCF Valuation
Valuation basis: This research model follows a five-year, unlevered FCFF DCF. It starts from reported annual operating inputs, forecasts revenue and operating cash conversion under an explicit mechanical policy, discounts FCFF at WACC, applies a Gordon-growth terminal value, and bridges enterprise value to an indicative common-equity value per share. It is an analytical estimate rather than a recommendation or personalised target price.
Step 1 — Forecast Operating Profit and NOPAT
| Reported operating input |
Value |
| Revenue |
$9.05B |
| Prior annual revenue |
$8.73B |
| EBIT |
$318.80M |
| Tax rate |
40.00% |
| NOPAT = EBIT × (1 − tax rate) |
$191.28M |
| Forecast start-growth basis |
3.72% |
| Forecast policy |
latest reported annual revenue growth, bounded to -10.00% / 15.00% |
Step 2 — Calculate FCFF
| Current FCFF building block |
Value |
| NOPAT |
$191.28M |
| Add: depreciation & amortisation |
$557.00M |
| Less: capital expenditure |
-$317.40M |
| Less/(add): working-capital cash-flow movement |
$89.60M |
| Current unlevered FCFF |
$520.48M |
Explicit FCFF forecast
| Forecast year |
Revenue growth |
NOPAT |
D&A |
Capex |
Change in NWC |
FCFF |
Present value |
| 1 |
3.72% |
$198.40M |
$577.73M |
-$329.21M |
$92.94M |
$539.85M |
$526.80M |
| 2 |
3.42% |
$205.18M |
$597.47M |
-$404.71M |
$96.11M |
$494.05M |
$459.08M |
| 3 |
3.11% |
$211.56M |
$616.06M |
-$483.56M |
$99.10M |
$443.16M |
$392.13M |
| 4 |
2.81% |
$217.50M |
$633.34M |
-$565.23M |
$101.88M |
$387.49M |
$326.49M |
| 5 |
2.50% |
$222.93M |
$649.18M |
-$649.18M |
$104.43M |
$327.36M |
$262.66M |
Step 3 — Determine the Discount Rate (WACC)
| WACC input |
Value |
| Risk-free rate |
4.71% |
| Equity risk premium assumption |
5.50% |
| Beta |
0.25 |
| Cost of equity |
6.09% |
| Pre-tax cost of debt |
5.13% |
| WACC |
5.02% |
| WACC validation |
requires assumption review |
Step 4 — Estimate Terminal Value
| Terminal-value input |
Value |
| Perpetuity growth rate |
2.50% |
| Terminal value |
$13.34B |
| Implied terminal EV / EBITDA |
13.07x |
| Terminal value as % of enterprise value |
84.15% |
Step 5 — Discount Cash Flows to Enterprise Value
| Enterprise-value component |
Value |
| Present value of explicit FCFF |
$1.97B |
| Present value of terminal value |
$10.44B |
| Indicated enterprise value |
$12.41B |
| Discounting convention |
mid-year for explicit FCFF; terminal value discounted at year-end five |
Step 6 — Convert Enterprise Value to Equity Value
| Equity bridge |
Value |
| Indicated enterprise value |
$12.41B |
| Less: gross interest-bearing debt |
$7.09B |
| Add: cash and equivalents |
$58.60M |
| Add: affiliate investments |
$0.00 |
| Less: minority interests |
$0.00 |
| Indicated common equity value |
$5.38B |
Step 7 — Calculate Indicative Value Per Share
| Per-share output |
Value |
| Shares used |
106,880,690.00 |
| Share-count basis |
reported shares outstanding; option/RSU dilution data not separately available |
| Current market price |
$119.81 |
| DCF indicative value per share |
$50.34 |
| Indicative value vs. market price |
-57.99% |
Model Integrity Checks
| Check |
Result |
| Perpetuity growth is below the risk-free rate |
pass |
| Perpetuity growth is below WACC |
pass |
| WACC is within the configured operating-company range |
review required |
| Terminal-year FCFF is positive |
pass |
| Terminal capex converges to D&A |
pass |
| Terminal-value concentration |
within review band |
| Implied price differs from spot by more than 30% |
review required |
2.6 Investor-Style Research Screen
| Educational screen |
Result |
| Buffett-inspired cash-quality checks |
3/4 evidenced checks |
| Lynch-inspired balance-and-growth checks |
3/4 evidenced checks |
Data lineage: Yahoo Finance public market and reported-statement data; retrieval timestamp: 2026-08-18 17:48:32.143140 UTC; latest reported fiscal period: 2026-04-30 00:00:00. Default assumptions: five-year forecast, mid-year discounting for explicit FCFF, a maximum 2.50% perpetuity-growth rate below both WACC and the risk-free rate, historical operating-ratio persistence, and capex convergence to D&A by year five. No sell-side consensus or management guidance is substituted for reported inputs. This is research and analysis only, not personalized financial advice.
2.7 Quantitative Factor Diagnostics
Model basis: Daily issuer USD excess returns are regressed in-sample using ordinary least squares on matching regional Fama–French factors. FF3 estimates market, size, and value loadings; FF5 adds profitability and investment. Coefficients are descriptive historical exposures, not predictions.
| Estimation input |
Value |
| Regional factor set |
US |
| Factor-return currency |
USD |
| Issuer-return basis |
USD adjusted total return |
| Estimation window |
2025-08-19 to 2026-06-30 |
| Aligned daily observations |
217 |
| Minimum observation requirement |
120 |
| Currency conversion for HK listings |
not required |
Fama–French Three-Factor and Five-Factor Results
| Diagnostic |
FF3 |
FF5 |
| Annualised alpha |
2.54% |
19.02% |
| Adjusted R² |
0.04 |
0.11 |
| Annualised residual volatility |
28.01% |
26.84% |
| Factor loading (t-statistic) |
FF3 |
FF5 |
| Market excess return (Mkt-RF) |
-0.29 (-1.76) |
0.05 (0.29) |
| Size (SMB) |
0.55 (2.48) |
0.41 (1.77) |
| Value (HML) |
0.10 (0.55) |
-0.43 (-1.88) |
| Profitability (RMW) |
NM |
0.39 (2.00) |
| Investment (CMA) |
NM |
1.11 (3.33) |
Definitions: Mkt-RF is the market return less the risk-free rate; SMB is small minus big; HML is high minus low book-to-market; RMW is robust minus weak profitability; CMA is conservative minus aggressive investment. Factor returns are sourced from the Kenneth R. French Data Library; issuer adjusted-return history is sourced from Yahoo Finance. For Hong Kong listings, adjusted HKD prices are converted into USD with daily USD/HKD closes before return calculation to match the USD regional factor basis. This is an in-sample historical regression; coefficients and t-statistics do not establish causation or predict future returns. This is research and analysis only, not personalized financial advice.