Loading verified market, valuation, and statement data.
2. Company Fundamentals
2.1 Competitiveness
| Metric |
Value |
| Operating Margins |
18.98% |
| Profit Margins |
10.52% |
| Return on Equity |
11.31% |
| Return on Assets |
6.04% |
| Free Float |
0.17B |
| Dividend Yield |
0.46% |
| Short Int % Utilisation |
2.27% |
2.2 Growth
| Metric |
Value |
| Revenue Growth |
13.0% |
| Free Cash Flow |
1.12B |
| EBITDA |
19.83 (Ratio) |
| Enterprise Value |
49.97B |
| EV/Revenue |
4.34 |
| EV/EBITDA |
19.83 |
Revenue growth of 13.0% indicates steady, moderate expansion.
2.3 Management
| Role |
Metric |
| Consensus Rating |
N/A |
2.4 Return
| Metric |
Value |
| Expected Return (Ann.) |
26.94% |
| Risk / Std Dev (Ann.) |
25.89% |
| Sharpe Ratio (rf=4.5%) |
0.87 |
| Beta |
0.94 |
DuPont Model Analysis
The DuPont model decomposes return on equity (ROE) into three operating and capital-structure drivers:
ROE = Net Margin × Asset Turnover × Equity Multiplier
The comparison uses the latest two comparable annual periods available for the issuer, with reported statement amounts shown in US$. Revenue and net income are income-statement flows; total assets and shareholders’ equity are year-end balance-sheet figures. This is a simplified year-end-balance DuPont comparison rather than an average-balance ROE calculation.
| DuPont component |
Calculation |
FY2025 |
FY2024 |
| Revenue |
Reported revenue |
$11.17B |
$10.39B |
| Net income |
Reported net income |
$1.17B |
$1.06B |
| Total assets |
Year-end reported balance |
$22.07B |
$18.70B |
| Shareholders’ equity |
Year-end reported balance |
$11.14B |
$10.09B |
| Net margin |
Net income ÷ revenue |
10.48% |
10.17% |
| Asset turnover |
Revenue ÷ total assets |
0.5060x |
0.5554x |
| Equity multiplier |
Total assets ÷ shareholders’ equity |
1.9807x |
1.8533x |
| ROE |
Net margin × asset turnover × equity multiplier |
10.50% |
10.46% |
Source: Yahoo Finance annual statements. Values are based on the two latest comparable annual periods returned by the source; fiscal period labels use the statement period-end year.
2.5 FCFF DCF Valuation
Valuation basis: This research model follows a five-year, unlevered FCFF DCF. It starts from reported annual operating inputs, forecasts revenue and operating cash conversion under an explicit mechanical policy, discounts FCFF at WACC, applies a Gordon-growth terminal value, and bridges enterprise value to an indicative common-equity value per share. It is an analytical estimate rather than a recommendation or personalised target price.
Step 1 — Forecast Operating Profit and NOPAT
| Reported operating input |
Value |
| Revenue |
$11.17B |
| Prior annual revenue |
$10.39B |
| EBIT |
$1.82B |
| Tax rate |
25.69% |
| NOPAT = EBIT × (1 − tax rate) |
$1.35B |
| Forecast start-growth basis |
7.51% |
| Forecast policy |
latest reported annual revenue growth, bounded to -10.00% / 15.00% |
Step 2 — Calculate FCFF
| Current FCFF building block |
Value |
| NOPAT |
$1.35B |
| Add: depreciation & amortisation |
$457.00M |
| Less: capital expenditure |
-$260.00M |
| Less/(add): working-capital cash-flow movement |
$7.00M |
| Current unlevered FCFF |
$1.55B |
Explicit FCFF forecast
| Forecast year |
Revenue growth |
NOPAT |
D&A |
Capex |
Change in NWC |
FCFF |
Present value |
| 1 |
7.51% |
$1.45B |
$491.32M |
-$279.52M |
$7.53M |
$1.67B |
$1.60B |
| 2 |
6.26% |
$1.54B |
$522.06M |
-$353.28M |
$8.00M |
$1.72B |
$1.51B |
| 3 |
5.00% |
$1.62B |
$548.19M |
-$430.03M |
$8.40M |
$1.75B |
$1.40B |
| 4 |
3.75% |
$1.68B |
$568.76M |
-$507.46M |
$8.71M |
$1.75B |
$1.29B |
| 5 |
2.50% |
$1.72B |
$582.98M |
-$582.98M |
$8.93M |
$1.73B |
$1.17B |
Step 3 — Determine the Discount Rate (WACC)
| WACC input |
Value |
| Risk-free rate |
4.71% |
| Equity risk premium assumption |
5.50% |
| Beta |
0.93 |
| Cost of equity |
9.82% |
| Pre-tax cost of debt |
4.73% |
| WACC |
9.19% |
| WACC validation |
within standard range |
Step 4 — Estimate Terminal Value
| Terminal-value input |
Value |
| Perpetuity growth rate |
2.50% |
| Terminal value |
$26.55B |
| Implied terminal EV / EBITDA |
9.15x |
| Terminal value as % of enterprise value |
71.08% |
Step 5 — Discount Cash Flows to Enterprise Value
| Enterprise-value component |
Value |
| Present value of explicit FCFF |
$6.96B |
| Present value of terminal value |
$17.11B |
| Indicated enterprise value |
$24.07B |
| Discounting convention |
mid-year for explicit FCFF; terminal value discounted at year-end five |
Step 6 — Convert Enterprise Value to Equity Value
| Equity bridge |
Value |
| Indicated enterprise value |
$24.07B |
| Less: gross interest-bearing debt |
$5.54B |
| Add: cash and equivalents |
$764.00M |
| Add: affiliate investments |
$0.00 |
| Less: minority interests |
$48.00M |
| Indicated common equity value |
$19.24B |
Step 7 — Calculate Indicative Value Per Share
| Per-share output |
Value |
| Shares used |
171,100,000.00 |
| Share-count basis |
reported diluted weighted-average shares |
| Current market price |
$294.93 |
| DCF indicative value per share |
$112.47 |
| Indicative value vs. market price |
-61.87% |
Model Integrity Checks
| Check |
Result |
| Perpetuity growth is below the risk-free rate |
pass |
| Perpetuity growth is below WACC |
pass |
| WACC is within the configured operating-company range |
pass |
| Terminal-year FCFF is positive |
pass |
| Terminal capex converges to D&A |
pass |
| Terminal-value concentration |
within review band |
| Implied price differs from spot by more than 30% |
review required |
2.6 Investor-Style Research Screen
| Educational screen |
Result |
| Buffett-inspired cash-quality checks |
4/4 evidenced checks |
| Lynch-inspired balance-and-growth checks |
4/4 evidenced checks |
Data lineage: Yahoo Finance public market and reported-statement data; retrieval timestamp: 2026-08-18 17:53:59.780916 UTC; latest reported fiscal period: 2025-12-31 00:00:00. Default assumptions: five-year forecast, mid-year discounting for explicit FCFF, a maximum 2.50% perpetuity-growth rate below both WACC and the risk-free rate, historical operating-ratio persistence, and capex convergence to D&A by year five. No sell-side consensus or management guidance is substituted for reported inputs. This is research and analysis only, not personalized financial advice.
2.7 Quantitative Factor Diagnostics
Model basis: Daily issuer USD excess returns are regressed in-sample using ordinary least squares on matching regional Fama–French factors. FF3 estimates market, size, and value loadings; FF5 adds profitability and investment. Coefficients are descriptive historical exposures, not predictions.
| Estimation input |
Value |
| Regional factor set |
US |
| Factor-return currency |
USD |
| Issuer-return basis |
USD adjusted total return |
| Estimation window |
2025-08-19 to 2026-06-30 |
| Aligned daily observations |
217 |
| Minimum observation requirement |
120 |
| Currency conversion for HK listings |
not required |
Fama–French Three-Factor and Five-Factor Results
| Diagnostic |
FF3 |
FF5 |
| Annualised alpha |
7.77% |
13.60% |
| Adjusted R² |
0.42 |
0.43 |
| Annualised residual volatility |
18.88% |
18.57% |
| Factor loading (t-statistic) |
FF3 |
FF5 |
| Market excess return (Mkt-RF) |
1.16 (10.45) |
1.29 (10.23) |
| Size (SMB) |
0.38 (2.56) |
0.29 (1.84) |
| Value (HML) |
0.60 (4.67) |
0.36 (2.30) |
| Profitability (RMW) |
NM |
0.09 (0.71) |
| Investment (CMA) |
NM |
0.55 (2.37) |
Definitions: Mkt-RF is the market return less the risk-free rate; SMB is small minus big; HML is high minus low book-to-market; RMW is robust minus weak profitability; CMA is conservative minus aggressive investment. Factor returns are sourced from the Kenneth R. French Data Library; issuer adjusted-return history is sourced from Yahoo Finance. For Hong Kong listings, adjusted HKD prices are converted into USD with daily USD/HKD closes before return calculation to match the USD regional factor basis. This is an in-sample historical regression; coefficients and t-statistics do not establish causation or predict future returns. This is research and analysis only, not personalized financial advice.